Currently, the Federal Rules of Evidence assume that earnestly given testimony can be relied upon to be true in most situations, so long as that testimony is not inadmissible hearsay.

Longtime readers will recall that every so often, I would go on a "rant" about how many federal judges were ignoring the text of Federal Rule of Evidence 702, as amended in 2000.

[on] these new rules of evidence, in essence, that the Supreme Court just conjured up out of thin air, and will be applying ...

Highlights. Proposed amendments to federal rules of evidence address authentication of evidence generated by artificial intelligence (AI) If an AI output is offered as evidence, and that type of ...

Colorado Rule of Evidence 1002 tweaks this concept slightly, providing only that, “To prove the content of a writing, recording, or photograph, the original writing, recording, or photograph is ...

A case before the 11th Circuit could decide whether rules must be based in evidence or can just spring from bureaucrats' ...

The law, which carves out an exception to hearsay statements under the Maine Rules of Evidence does, however, require that the alleged victim be available for cross-examination at trial.

Maine, Unbound by the Rules of Evidence, Relies on ‘Hearsay’ To Disqualify the 45th President From a Place on the State’s Ballot in 2024. The frontrunner for the Republican nomination for president is ...

The best-evidence rule applies only if an "original" exists, but Pavliv's testimony established that the Snapchat communication, as was customary, was automatically deleted.

Supreme Court Just Set New Rules of Evidence 'Out of Thin Air'—Attorney. Published Jul 04, 2024 at 6:09 PM EDT Updated Jul 05, 2024 at 11:31 AM EDT. By .