News

Supreme Court examines Tamil Nadu government's petition against Madras High Court's interim order on Vice-Chancellor ...
Supreme Court examines Tamil Nadu government's petition against Madras High Court's interim order on Vice-Chancellor ...
The U.S. Supreme Court has overruled its decision upholding a transgender student's bathroom access. The case will now be ...
The Milwaukee school board’s firing of an elementary school counselor after a profanity-tinged speech against transgender ...
An amendment introduced by Republican Senator Joni Ernst of Iowa passed with an overwhelming voice vote on June 30, as it targeted people who have more than one million dollars in income who receive ...
Republican Party leaders are rushing to overcome lingering internal fights over President Donald Trump’s massive tax and ...
It’s pretty wild and welcoming at Bustin’ Loose Cowboy Church where Christians worship outdoors in a large canvas tent year-round in Chewelah, Washington – a small town of approximately 2,800 about 45 ...
So hard that the last time that happened was in 1992--and that amendment, No. 27, was put in motion in 1789. (Oh, you don't know the trouble the Twenty-Seventh Amendment has seen.
Seventh Amendment jury trial issues from the patent owner’s perspective were at the center of the U.S. Supreme Court’s April 2019 ruling in Oil States Energy Services v.
The last time the Supreme Court considered in any detail whether to incorporate the Seventh Amendment was in 1916, 109 years ago, in Minneapolis & St. Louis R. Co. v. Bombolis, 241 U.S. 211 (1916).
The conservative 5th Circuit court said the FCC "acted as prosecutor, jury, and judge," violating AT&T's Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial. The ruling wasn't a major surprise.