The law of armed conflict: legality vs. legitimacy Mar 13, 2017, 7:58 PM Edit. ... Since the 1980s, all of Israel’s armed conflicts have been fought against non-state actors, ...

States and armed groups could in turn facilitate this by accepting credible fact-finding missions which would show their own efforts to respect the law. Adama Dieng also deplored the alarming ...

Many humanitarian law experts would argue that Hamas and Israel are engaged in what is known as a "non-international armed conflict."In other words, it would be classified the same way as a civil ...

On Aug. 12, 1949, the international community ratified the Geneva Conventions, also known as the International Humanitarian Law (IHL), establishing the rules and guidelines during armed conflict. The ...

The Israel Defense Forces bend over backward to comply with the law of armed conflict and the Geneva Conventions in their ongoing fight with Islamic terrorist groups such as Hamas.

JURIST Guest Columnist David M. Crane of Syracuse University College of Law discusses enforcing the laws of armed conflict in an age of extremes…. Shortly after three planes went into three buildings ...

The existing framework of the law of armed conflict is the best legal mechanism by which to regulate autonomous weapon systems, their uses, and the battlefield environments where they are used.

The handbook provides crucial guidance to Soldiers and Marines on the Law of Armed Conflict, or LOAC. It also helps U.S. troops comply with international and host nation laws.

It is worthwhile acquiring the following books: Yoram Dinstein, The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict (Cambridge UP, 2nd ed., 2010, or 3rd ed., 2016), Roberts and ...

On 21 April 2016, the ICRC hosted a livestreamed panel at the Humanitarium to discuss whether international humanitarian law (IHL) is under threat today; and if so – what are the ways forward to ...